THEY DO
NOT EVEN
KNOW WHICH KNOT THEY REALLY MADE :
Nautile's HELP
FOR ALL THOSE DUMMIES who write NONSENSE POSTS
about the NAME (simple ignorance ) and the TYPE ( ignorance, stupidity
and
contamination of other persons! ) of the knots they expose:
Michel SINCE sent me a knot ( 50L 8B ) TWO-STRAND
which is
perfect for a lesson about
GAUCHO Knots , HEAD-HUNTER Knots, FAN Knots
and
GAUCHO ¨PATTERNED Knots BUT
NOT GAUCHO KNOTS,
FAN PATTERNED Knots
BUT
NOT FAN KNOTS,
HEAD-HUNTER PATTERNED Knots
BUT NOT HEAD-HUNTER KNOTS
This is in direct relation with the topic just under this one.
Well saying that
a 2-STRAND SEMI-REGULAR CYLINDRICAL KNOT
sporting a Gaucho PATTERN
IS REALLY a Gaucho KNOT (which is a
SINGLE-STRAND REGULAR
CYLINDRICAL KNOTS) is just as
stupid as my new zebras are !
Here is the
.ARI file to be opened using software ARIANE.
GAUCHO, HEAD-HUNTER, FAN KNOTS are
REGULAR CYLINDRICAL
KNOTS COLUMN-CODED
( horizontal
mandrel frame of reference ) they are so
SINGLE-STRAND.
If they are NOT
single strand then they are NOT GAUCHO
KNOT, HEAD-HUNTER KNOT, FAN KNOT.
SEMI-REGULAR CYLINDRICAL KNOTS are MULTI-STRAND
; each
strand is following the CORDAGE ROUTE of a REGULAR CYLINDRICAL KNOT.
That they have, say a GAUCHO PATTERN
does not make them a GAUCHO KNOT!
GAUCHO KNOT is a PARTICULAR CORDAGE ROUTEAND
A PARTICULAR CODING PATTERN NOT
JUST the PATTERN. Same thing fro FAN knots, HEAD-HUNTER
knots or any other RegularCylindrical Knots.
(Read in Turkshead_28 the topic on cordage
route, coding pattern and colour pattern)
Read MODULARITY http://tinyurl.com/ck5zl74
( extracted from last topic down the page
in Turks
head_27 ) to get
"general" formulas as I illustrated only the 2-PASS-based cases.
A VERY USEFUL GIFT : MICHEL SINCE undertook to
reproduce, using RKnot
Builder ( Claude HOCHET's
software for Regular Cylindrical Knots) : all
the grids that are in SCHAAKE-TURNER -SEDGEWICK
book BRAIDING REGULAR KNOTS (published in 1988).
Those new tracings are more pleasant to the eye than the original ones.
Regular Knots PDF ( just a bit over 1Mo) REGULAR (SINGLE-STRAND )
CYLINDRICAL KNOTS
(using horizontal mandrel frame of referrence : bights are on left and
right side )
TURK'S HEAD Knot, (Row AND column coded)
GAUCHO
Knot, RING Knot, (Column Coded)
FAN Knot,
BOTON ORIENTALE knot, (Column Coded)
AZTEC-FAN
Knot, (Column Coded)
HEAD-HUNTER Knot, (Column Coded)
GINFER
Knot, (Column Coded)
SAMUEL
Knot, (Column Coded)
PERFECT
HERRINGBONE Knot, (Row-Coded)
BEVERLEY
Knot, (Row-Coded)
SLOW
HELIX Knot, (Row Coded)
FAST
HELIX Knot, ( Neither Row Nor Column Coded )
BASKET WEAVE Knot, ( Neither Row Nor
Column Coded )
some
other
ROW-CODED Knots.
Each and every knot-tyer should study SCHAAKE and
TURNER's works before
writing stupid posts.
DUMB IGNORANT ( all ignorant are not dumb ! ) PLAYING AT
"SAVANT
AND CONTAMINATING NAIVE IGNORANT PERSONS WITH THEIR FALSE
KNOWLEDGE
Each and every knot-tyer should study TURNER and SCHAAKE works before
writing stupid posts contaminating other innocent persons with
their egregious ignorance.
Three : some dumb ignorant speaks of GAUCHO-FAN, thereCAN be
no such thing
:
either it is GAUCHO or it is FAN but GAUCHO-FAN is
nonsensical or
absurd.
It is not wrong not to know ( if you know how to shut up ), what is
wrong, deeply wrong is to open
one's big mouth when being an ignorant pretending to be a savant and so
contaminating other persons with a false knowledge.
Myself I
can, some times, be mistaken but I am usually quick to make a
correction and then to warned all that I pushed in the wrong direction
by being mistaken.
Never take, from any one, what is given to you as "absolutely true" ,
at best it is
"absolutely honest" but honesty and sincerity does not
make TRUTH.
When you don't know for sure just stay "simply, basically descriptive"
but NEVER give a false name or type: saying 50L 8B 2-STRAND THK
ASSEMBLY cannot be
faulted for exemple but saying FAN KNOT could !
Such persons should read MODULARITY http://tinyurl.com/ck5zl74
( extracted from last topic down the page
in Turks
head_27 ) to be, may be, if
they can understand what is told, a bit less
prone to contaminate others with their false-knowledge.
What is shown by that silly poster is a (U2-O2) 2 times , U1 one time
so NOT
a GAUCHO KNOT,
NOT
a FAN KNOT,
and NOT
a HEAD-HUNTER
KNOT
ALL REGULAR CYLINDRICAL KNOTS SO SINGLE-STRAND !
(control that with MODULARITY in case I mistyped )
(Ux
- Ox)
m
times +
(Ux)
n
times == TURK'S
HEAD
with x=1 and n=1
and with
x greater than 1
(Ux - Ox)
m times == GAUCHO
(Ux - Ox)
m times , (Ux) one time ==
HEAD-HUNTER and
mirror Head-Hunter knot , (Ox)
one time , (Ux
- Ox) m times
(U(x-1) - Ox-1)
one time, (Ux
- Ox) m times , (U(x-1) -
O(x-1))
one time == FAN
I will let alone AZTEC, AZTEC-FAN and HYBRIDS without name
that you can
study in MODULARITY. http://tinyurl.com/ck5zl74
Let us tackle again the case in point but not using abstract formulas.
Let us chose 2-PASS
KNOT SHOWN is U2 - O2 - U2 - O2
- U1
GAUCHO KNOT == a "round number"
of ( O2-U2 ) or of (U2-O2)
U2 - O2 - U2 - O2
or U2 - O2
- U2 - O2 - U2 - O2
FAN KNOT == ONE time (U1) + a
"round
number" of ( O2-U2 ) + ONE time (O1)
so FAN == U1 - O2
- U2 -O2 - U2 - O1
or
ONE time (O1) + a "round number" of de U2-O2) + ONE time (U1)
so FAN == O1
- U2 - O2 -
U2 -O2 - U1
The knot shown U2 -
O2 - U2 - O2 - U1 is
at best an AMPUTATED
FAN PATTERN so you see it is absurd , in order to express the side that
was not amputated, to say
RIGHT FAN or LEFT
FAN as if you turn a RIGHT by 180° it is now a LEFT !
O1 - U2 - O2
- U2 - O2
The knot shown by the culprit could
(falsely) be seen as a variation of FAN PATTERN or a variation
of
HEAD-HUNTER PATTERN or a variation of GAUCHO PATTERN :
hence I see it as a "NO NAME SEMI-REGULAR
CYLINDRICAL KNOT and you can have it in four flavours.
ONE time (U1) + a "round number" of ( O2-U2 )
so U1 - O2
- U2 - O2 - U2
a "round number" of ( O2-U2 ) + ONE time (O1)
so O2 - U2 - O2 - U2
- O1
of course those two above are just the same knot turned 180°
hence the absurdity of trying to call it RIGHT FAN
ONE time (O1) + a "round number" of (U2-O2) so O1 - U2
- O2 - U2 - O2
a "round number" of ( U2-O2) + ONE time (U1)
so U2 - O2 - U2 - O2
- U1
of course those two above are just the same knot turned 180°
hence the absurdity of trying to call it LEFT FAN
HEAD-HUNTER KNOT would be
ONE time (U2) + a "round number" of ( O2-U2 ) U2 - O2 - U2 -
O2 - U2
a "round number" of ( O2-U2 ) + ONE time (O2)
O2 - U2 - O2 - U2 - O2 of course those two above are just the same knot
turned 180°
ONE time (O2) + a "round number" of U2-O2) O2 - U2 - O2 - U2 -
O2
a "round number" of ( U2-O2) + ONE time (U2)
U2 - O2 - U2 - O2
- U2 of course those two above are just the same knot
turned 180°
I hope that now I am clear ? ( just hope I did not mistyped something !
)
The knot shown is a "NO NAME SEMI-REGULAR CYLINDRICAL KNOT"